🔗 Share this article

Within her latest book, named We the People, Jill Lepore presents an extensive 600-page case for the US constitution as a evolving document, designed for revised with every generation.

An Profound Historical Critique of Originalist Theory

The author notes how her work serves as “an in-depth historical critique of the originalist approach,” the right-leaning legal doctrine that currently shapes the highest court. She argues that intense partisan polarization has rendered constitutional amendments virtually politically impossible.

Among originalists, only the intentions of the individuals who wrote the document during the Constitutional Convention back in 1787 ought to be used to divine constitutional intent, even centuries later within a nation filled with cars, aircraft, firearms, artificial intelligence, rights granted to women and marginalized groups—topics the founders did not know.

For Lepore, like many scholars, that is clearly illogical.

“The originalist movement represents a peculiar category which contains multitudes,” she stated. “But within the more reductive interpretations of originalism lies the insistence stating that this how the constitution was written and intended to be interpreted since its inception.”

Historical Context and Confidentiality

Lepore points out how James Madison’s notes of that Constitutional Convention were not released till 1840, years after Madison’s death. Lepore notes how delegates adhered to an unofficial five-decade pledge of silence, indicating they weren't supposed to disclose what transpired during the proceedings since such information wasn’t intended to matter document interpretation.

Likewise, the ratifying assembly debates were not especially conclusive, while the Federalist Papers—written by James Madison, Hamilton, along with John Jay—were published mainly within New York newspapers and were not broadly read outside that state. These texts were rarely referenced by the supreme court over a significant period.

Irony and within the Federalist Society

Lepore points out a minor yet powerful irony: In 1982, conservative individuals founded the legal organization, which would become a driving force of originalist thought. As a logo, they chose the framer’s silhouette. However, finding his real facial feature displeasing, members altered the image providing Madison a nicer appearance.

“I really aimed to put the nose in there,” Lepore stated, chuckling. “This is one amusing detail which points toward the adaptability inside a movement that claims to prioritize original accuracy.”

The Amendments Project

The professor additionally details the research on the Amendments Project, a resource that provides an searchable archive containing each effort to amend the US constitution. Since merely 27 changes have actually passed, she views this not as an archive of unsuccessful attempts instead as an exploration of possibility.

Lepore emphasizes that young people lack an awareness of civic possibility, and studying even unsuccessful amendments can be inspiring and informative.

Forgotten Personalities and Their Struggles

In the book, the author spotlights lesser-known American individuals that campaigned for constitutional change. Among these are John Jones and his spouse, Mary Jones, who were prominent within the African American civic convention efforts across Chicago.

Lepore argues that focusing upon these individuals—instead of only famous icons like Douglass—allows audiences better imagine ordinary people taking part in political change.

An Living Text Crafted from the Past

Lepore concludes by reinforcing the vision of the constitution as a dynamic document—one constructed from “historical records and natural materials… sheepskin and quill pens” yet still entirely alive plus able of change.

She expresses optimism that the foundation could yet “come again” through future eras who persist to participate with its amendment process.