🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have voted to pull out from an international accord created to protect women from violence, including family violence, following extensive and heated discussions in the legislature.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in the capital this past week to oppose the decision. The ultimate decision now lies with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the proposed law.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only became active in Latvia last year, requiring governments to establish legal frameworks and support services to eliminate all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the initial European Union member to initiate the process of withdrawing from the convention. The transcontinental nation withdrew in two years ago, a decision that rights groups characterized as a significant regression for women's rights.

Political Controversy and Resistance

The treaty was ratified by the EU in last year, yet traditionalist groups have contended that its emphasis on equal rights undermines family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Latvian parliament, MPs voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a action sponsored by political opponents but supported by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a defeat for centre-right Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined protesters outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence does not triumph," she stated to the assembly.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the primary political groups supporting the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has called on citizens to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

Latvia's human rights commissioner the rights official urged the agreement not to be made political, while the organization the rights organization stated it was "not a danger to national principles, it served as a tool to realize them".

The recent decision has sparked broad protest both inside Latvia and abroad.

22,000 individuals have signed a national petition calling for the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a protest for the coming week, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the will of the nation's citizens.

International Concerns and Possible Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's legislative body stated that Latvia had made a rash choice driven by misinformation. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying regression for female equality and human rights in Europe".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the treaty in 2021, cases of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not achieve a two-thirds majority, the president could potentially send back the legislation for further consideration if he holds concerns.

President Rinkevics announced on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to legal principles, "taking into account governmental and judicial factors, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Recently, another member of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, indicated it would not exclude appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a concerning situation for gender equality not only in our nation but across the continent," commented a human rights activist.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in multiple European countries
• The European treaty requires particular safeguards for survivors of domestic abuse
• The nation's vote could influence similar discussions in other member states